Use for money earned

[petrsurf]

Nicely said . Money ( airhaulers , fspax ...) pilot in command and his duty " FSC". that's all . why to invest valuable time into something what has been already set by somebody else . Why not to stick to and brush up with addition enhancement for already great idea. ( like better wether reading minima, request noaa wether for watsim flying , more sound enhancement for Fo , perhaps voice command for Fo etc .) thanks Petr

[Moostafa]

Apr 17, 2013 18:48:22 GMT -5 Aviator992 said:

This is straight from the FSCaptain product page on Simmarket - "One final example. In the real world, presidents and CEOs of airlines are not working pilots. They don't have the time if they are doing their jobs as executives. FSCaptain focuses on tracking the career of an airline pilot, not an airline CEO or CFO. In FSCaptain you do not buy and sell airplanes or manage your company's maintenance operation, nor set prices for tickets or cabin service items. The financial health of the company you work for is not your concern -- you are there to do your job: delivering your payload (passengers or cargo or both) on-time and safely to your destination with consummate professionalism. That's a difficult enough job."

I'm no trying to be rude or anything, but this is the complete opposite of what FSCaptain was made for. If its standalone and a separate program, then sure, thats another thing. I know that was stated earlier, but i'm just wanting to make sure it will stay that way. But putting this into FSCaptain I think is a waste and goes against what it was designed for.

You do realize that Travis is part of the development team…right?

Not to be rude but maybe you should learn to comprehend what you read and what has been written in this tread. FSC is not what we are talking about. Travis made mention of an “Airline management” program that might be in the works, not FSC, and I was clearly asking for any update on that idea and not an addition to be made to the FSC program.

No one is trying to change the direction of the FSC.

Tip #1 – Taking the time to think before one posts goes a long way in not making one look foolish.

[Moostafa]

Apr 18, 2013 2:03:13 GMT -5 petrsurf said:

Nicely said . Money ( airhaulers , fspax ...) pilot in command and his duty " FSC". that's all . why to invest valuable time into something what has been already set by somebody else . Why not to stick to and brush up with addition enhancement for already great idea. ( like better wether reading minima, request noaa wether for watsim flying , more sound enhancement for Fo , perhaps voice command for Fo etc .) thanks Petr

Is it really that hard to comprehend that an Airline simulation would be more than just spending money you earn as a pilot?

I too am not looking for the development of FSC to stop but at some point I’m thinking Dutch and the gang are going to want another stream of income coming in order to help them keep up their development work on FSC.

Travis made mention of an Airline management program, not FSC, but one that would use FSC as it foundation that might be in the works. With the work Dutch and the gang has done with FSC I have to think this program would be equally great if not better and find it hard to understand why anyone would be against such a program being made by this team.

I remember when FSPassengers first came out and there were individuals asking for it to be more like FSCaptain is today. Back then there were plenty of people going on about how that’s not what the program was about and no one would buy or support it if it did move in that direction. Funny how you don’t hear much about FSPassengers anymore.

[captwotan]

The forum for FSP is still fairly active and people are still buying it!!

I think perhaps Dutch should release some major improvements but call it FSCaptain 2.0 and charge an upgrade fee, perhaps around £10

On another note, has anybody seen Dutch or Travis lately, neither has been logging in much

[Aviator992]

Apr 18, 2013 10:03:45 GMT -5 Moostafa said:

You do realize that Travis is part of the development team…right?

Not to be rude but maybe you should learn to comprehend what you read and what has been written in this tread. FSC is not what we are talking about. Travis made mention of an “Airline management” program that might be in the works, not FSC, and I was clearly asking for any update on that idea and not an addition to be made to the FSC program.

No one is trying to change the direction of the FSC.

Tip #1 – Taking the time to think before one posts goes a long way in not making one look foolish.

Of course I know who Travis is, i'm not as stupid as you may think I am. Perhaps you yourself should stop being hypocritical and follow your own tip above - I clearly said "If its standalone and a separate program, then sure, thats another thing. I know that was stated earlier, but i'm just wanting to make sure it will stay that way."

Maybe you should stop taking things so personally and understand that people have their own opinions that may conflict with yours. You support this idea and im attempting to get more details on it. I wasn't replying initially in regards to you, I was replying to the main topic of this thread. I don't want this idea to take away from the core functionality of what FSCaptain was designed for. My goal was to establish that it would be a separate program and optional. There's no need to reply in a snotty tone to everyone simply because you feel they're attacking you or because they disagree with an idea you support. Nobody needs to deal with that; we're all here for the same reason, to use and enjoy FSCaptain.

[petrsurf]

well I said what I wanted to say others have opinion too and I am out off this topic .

[Moostafa]

I’m not taking anything you or anyone else says in this thread personally. I don’t know you and frankly you mean nothing to me or my life so obviously it can’t be personal. It’s unfortunate that you take offence to my directness but we have a saying in the Marine Corps, “if you don’t like being treated like a man, go sit at the little girls table”.

You are welcome to your opinion, but this has nothing to do with your opinion. You made statements that are nonsense and got called out on them and you don’t like that. It was clearly stated early in this thread that the Airline management program would be a separate program from FSC. After that statement was made, was there really a need for you to have a goal of establishing that it would be a separate program and optional? And come ’on, what functionality of FSC do you really think is going to be affected by a separate airline management program?

Personally, what I think is you don’t like the idea of this development team spending any development time on anything but FSC, but instead of just coming out and saying that, you felt the need to turn to doom and gloom tactics. As if somehow this development team would all of the sudden abandon the core functionality of what FSC was designed for, utter nonsense!

If you don’t like the idea, fine, but don’t act like Dutch and gang would allow it to affect FSC adversely if they did develop it.

Have a nice day.

[petrsurf]

Mate I relay just say my opinion, what ever you want just do . Lastly for your info , I have a military training ,I ve been there so please don't tell me anything about military OK .